[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#61326: [DRAFT PATCH v3] Work around zip's filename extension limitat
From: |
Ruijie Yu |
Subject: |
bug#61326: [DRAFT PATCH v3] Work around zip's filename extension limitation (was: Adding --no-add-suffix to zip patch) |
Date: |
Sun, 05 Mar 2023 23:23:59 +0800 |
User-agent: |
mu4e 1.8.14; emacs 30.0.50 |
Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> writes:
>> From: Ruijie Yu <ruijie@netyu.xyz>
>> Cc: asjo@koldfront.dk, 61326@debbugs.gnu.org
>> Date: Sat, 04 Mar 2023 22:56:21 +0800
>>
>> > I see that you don't have a copyright assignment on file, so would you
>> > like me to send you the form to fill, which will start the legal
>> > paperwork of assigning the copyright to the FSF? Once that is
>> > completed, we can install these changes.
>> >
>> > Thanks.
>>
>> Please do, thanks.
>
> Form sent off-list.
Response sent to assign@gnu, thanks.
By the way, while writing tests, I see a need to modify
`archive-expunge' to accept an additional optional argument FORCE acting
as the prefix argument. I suppose if this is favored, I should probably
say something in the etc/NEWS file (as well as the docstring, and maybe
an info page somewhere)? FTR, previously prefix arguments are ignored
for `archive-expunge'.
The reason for the need of a FORCE argument is so that I want to ensure
that file contents are correct after deleting a member using
archive-mode functionalities without getting prompted for confirmation.
However, `archive-expunge' ATM requires a user prompt via its baked-in
`yes-or-no-p' call.
An alternative to the above is to move the meat of said function into a
new internal helper function which simply skips over prompting the user.
This would keep the `archive-expunge' API untouched.
A new draft iteration should be here in a few days, with the question(s)
above answered. Thanks.
--
Best,
RY
- bug#61326: [DRAFT PATCH v3] Work around zip's filename extension limitation (was: Adding --no-add-suffix to zip patch), Eli Zaretskii, 2023/03/04
- bug#61326: [DRAFT PATCH v3] Work around zip's filename extension limitation (was: Adding --no-add-suffix to zip patch), Ruijie Yu, 2023/03/04
- bug#61326: [DRAFT PATCH v3] Work around zip's filename extension limitation (was: Adding --no-add-suffix to zip patch), Eli Zaretskii, 2023/03/04
- bug#61326: [DRAFT PATCH v3] Work around zip's filename extension limitation (was: Adding --no-add-suffix to zip patch),
Ruijie Yu <=
- bug#61326: [DRAFT PATCH v3] Work around zip's filename extension limitation (was: Adding --no-add-suffix to zip patch), Eli Zaretskii, 2023/03/05
- bug#61326: [DRAFT PATCH v4] Work around zip's filename extension limitation (was: Adding --no-add-suffix to zip patch), Ruijie Yu, 2023/03/05
- bug#61326: [DRAFT PATCH v4] Work around zip's filename extension limitation (was: Adding --no-add-suffix to zip patch), Eli Zaretskii, 2023/03/11
- bug#61326: [DRAFT PATCH v4] Work around zip's filename extension limitation (was: Adding --no-add-suffix to zip patch), Ruijie Yu, 2023/03/11
- bug#61326: [DRAFT PATCH v5] Work around zip's filename extension limitation (was: Adding --no-add-suffix to zip patch), Ruijie Yu, 2023/03/16