[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#62238: 30.0.50; Unusual interpretation of "S-expressions" in c-ts-mo
From: |
Yuan Fu |
Subject: |
bug#62238: 30.0.50; Unusual interpretation of "S-expressions" in c-ts-mode |
Date: |
Sat, 18 Mar 2023 14:34:03 -0700 |
> On Mar 18, 2023, at 3:31 AM, Kévin Le Gouguec <kevin.legouguec@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> Yuan Fu <casouri@gmail.com> writes:
>
>> I tested this on my Emacs session and vanilla session, and both marked to the
>> closing bracket. I believe forward-sexp should just work by the syntax
>> table. Perhaps it’s your config or something?
>
> FWIW, I tested this on
>
> * the master branch (where Philip reported the bug): I can reproduce
> Philip's results;
>
> 2023-03-18 "; * lisp/find-dired.el (find-gnu-find-p): Doc fix."
> (95d5154feed)
>
> * emacs-29: things work as you (Yuan) describe.
>
> 2023-03-18 "; Fix 'make-obsolete-variable' forms" (faee8d50738)
>
> So maybe something that will get resolved by the next merge? Or
> something that has been broken or master.
Duh, ok, I know what’s going on. Theo added some sexp related tree-sitter stuff
to master, but I’ve been focusing on emacs-29. On emacs-29, c-ts-mode doesn’t
redefine forward-sexp-function and the default function uses the syntax table,
which works fine.
Yuan
- bug#62238: 30.0.50; Unusual interpretation of "S-expressions" in c-ts-mode, (continued)
- bug#62238: 30.0.50; Unusual interpretation of "S-expressions" in c-ts-mode, Daniel Martín, 2023/03/18
- bug#62238: 30.0.50; Unusual interpretation of "S-expressions" in c-ts-mode, Theodor Thornhill, 2023/03/18
- bug#62238: 30.0.50; Unusual interpretation of "S-expressions" in c-ts-mode, Eli Zaretskii, 2023/03/18
- bug#62238: 30.0.50; Unusual interpretation of "S-expressions" in c-ts-mode, Theodor Thornhill, 2023/03/18
- bug#62238: 30.0.50; Unusual interpretation of "S-expressions" in c-ts-mode, Daniel Martín, 2023/03/18
- bug#62238: 30.0.50; Unusual interpretation of "S-expressions" in c-ts-mode, Daniel Martín, 2023/03/18
- bug#62238: 30.0.50; Unusual interpretation of "S-expressions" in c-ts-mode, Eli Zaretskii, 2023/03/18
bug#62238: 30.0.50; Unusual interpretation of "S-expressions" in c-ts-mode, Kévin Le Gouguec, 2023/03/18
bug#62238: 30.0.50; Unusual interpretation of "S-expressions" in c-ts-mode,
Yuan Fu <=