[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#62412: 29.0.60; strange c++ indentation behavior with tree sitter
From: |
João Távora |
Subject: |
bug#62412: 29.0.60; strange c++ indentation behavior with tree sitter |
Date: |
Sat, 25 Mar 2023 17:53:23 +0000 |
On Sat, Mar 25, 2023 at 5:47 PM Herman, Géza <geza.herman@gmail.com> wrote:
> So if the aim is that the two c++ modes
> should work similarly out of the box, then it'd make sense to keep
> electric-indent-chars as is.
Only _if_ it is generally understood that c++-ts-mode's heuristics are
worse. And only _then_ if they can somehow fixed to become better.
Until these conditions are satisfied, I think electric-indent-chars
has to be left alone.
João
- bug#62412: 29.0.60; strange c++ indentation behavior with tree sitter, (continued)
- bug#62412: 29.0.60; strange c++ indentation behavior with tree sitter, Theodor Thornhill, 2023/03/24
- bug#62412: 29.0.60; strange c++ indentation behavior with tree sitter, Herman, 2023/03/25
- bug#62412: 29.0.60; strange c++ indentation behavior with tree sitter, João Távora, 2023/03/25
- bug#62412: 29.0.60; strange c++ indentation behavior with tree sitter, Herman, 2023/03/25
- bug#62412: 29.0.60; strange c++ indentation behavior with tree sitter, João Távora, 2023/03/25
- bug#62412: 29.0.60; strange c++ indentation behavior with tree sitter, Theodor Thornhill, 2023/03/25
- bug#62412: 29.0.60; strange c++ indentation behavior with tree sitter, Herman, 2023/03/25
- bug#62412: 29.0.60; strange c++ indentation behavior with tree sitter,
João Távora <=
- bug#62412: 29.0.60; strange c++ indentation behavior with tree sitter, Herman, 2023/03/26
- bug#62412: 29.0.60; strange c++ indentation behavior with tree sitter, Daniel Martín, 2023/03/26