[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#71049: async-shell-command ends with "Process *Async Shell Command*
|
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
|
Subject: |
bug#71049: async-shell-command ends with "Process *Async Shell Command* finished" when remote "direct-async-process" |
|
Date: |
Sun, 19 May 2024 09:17:03 +0300 |
> Date: Sun, 19 May 2024 03:19:00 +0300
> From: Dmitry Gutov <dmitry@gutov.dev>
>
> Previously mentioned in bug#70901.
>
> When a Tramp connection is configured as "direct-async-process",
>
> 1. If the buffer *Async Shell Command* does not exist, invoking M-& in a
> remote buffer from that connection makes it end with
>
> Process *Async Shell Command* finished
>
> The command can be simple, like 'ls' or 'echo 123'. I also see this
> added to *Messages*:
>
> Tramp: Inserting
> ‘/ssh:dgutov@fencepost.gnu.org:/home/d/dgutov/.tramp_history’...done
>
> Which seems odd (tramp history is re-read every time like this, for some
> purpose?).
>
> 2. If the buffer such named already exists when command is invoked, then
> this doesn't happen (the output seems correct). But *Messages* says
>
> -l: finished.
>
> ...which is a big puzzling as well.
>
> Also, scenario 1 (when the buffer doesn't exist yet) takes longer than
> 2, but that might be a side-effect of implementation external to Tramp.
The "finished" message comes from the default process sentinel, so if
Tramp wants to avoid that, it should install its own sentinel.
- bug#71049: async-shell-command ends with "Process *Async Shell Command* finished" when remote "direct-async-process", Dmitry Gutov, 2024/05/18
- bug#71049: async-shell-command ends with "Process *Async Shell Command* finished" when remote "direct-async-process",
Eli Zaretskii <=
- bug#71049: async-shell-command ends with "Process *Async Shell Command* finished" when remote "direct-async-process", Michael Albinus, 2024/05/24
- bug#71049: async-shell-command ends with "Process *Async Shell Command* finished" when remote "direct-async-process", Michael Albinus, 2024/05/24
- bug#71049: async-shell-command ends with "Process *Async Shell Command* finished" when remote "direct-async-process", Eli Zaretskii, 2024/05/24
- bug#71049: async-shell-command ends with "Process *Async Shell Command* finished" when remote "direct-async-process", Michael Albinus, 2024/05/24
- bug#71049: async-shell-command ends with "Process *Async Shell Command* finished" when remote "direct-async-process", Eli Zaretskii, 2024/05/24
- bug#71049: async-shell-command ends with "Process *Async Shell Command* finished" when remote "direct-async-process", Dmitry Gutov, 2024/05/24
- bug#71049: async-shell-command ends with "Process *Async Shell Command* finished" when remote "direct-async-process", Michael Albinus, 2024/05/25
- bug#71049: async-shell-command ends with "Process *Async Shell Command* finished" when remote "direct-async-process", Dmitry Gutov, 2024/05/25
- bug#71049: async-shell-command ends with "Process *Async Shell Command* finished" when remote "direct-async-process", Michael Albinus, 2024/05/25