[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#73853: 31.0.50; and-let* is useless
From: |
Michael Heerdegen |
Subject: |
bug#73853: 31.0.50; and-let* is useless |
Date: |
Mon, 21 Oct 2024 10:57:12 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) |
Augusto Stoffel <arstoffel@gmail.com> writes:
> I always type `if-let' because it looks cleaner and saves one indentation
> column (which are purely cosmetic reasons), but also I think it would be
> weird to have a something* when there's no accompanying something.
Good point, we should decide which names to use. Personally i prefer
the names ending with star, because bindings are not parallel as in
`let'. But we also already spoke about this. Dunno which names are
more popular, it's a matter of taste.
Michael.
- bug#73853: 31.0.50; and-let* is useless, Stefan Monnier, 2024/10/17
- bug#73853: 31.0.50; and-let* is useless, Sean Whitton, 2024/10/18
- bug#73853: 31.0.50; and-let* is useless, Stefan Kangas, 2024/10/20
- bug#73853: 31.0.50; Should and-let* become a synonym for when-let*?, Sean Whitton, 2024/10/22
- bug#73853: 31.0.50; Should and-let* become a synonym for when-let*?, Michael Heerdegen, 2024/10/22
- bug#73853: 31.0.50; Should and-let* become a synonym for when-let*?, Stefan Kangas, 2024/10/23
- bug#73853: 31.0.50; Should and-let* become a synonym for when-let*?, Sean Whitton, 2024/10/24
- bug#73853: 31.0.50; Should and-let* become a synonym for when-let*?, Sean Whitton, 2024/10/25
- bug#73853: 31.0.50; Should and-let* become a synonym for when-let*?, Michael Albinus, 2024/10/30
- bug#73853: 31.0.50; Should and-let* become a synonym for when-let*?, Jim Porter, 2024/10/26