|
From: | Drew Adams |
Subject: | bug#73853: 31.0.50; Should and-let* become a synonym for when-let*? |
Date: | Sun, 27 Oct 2024 20:00:08 +0000 |
> (if-let ((a (does-an-a-exist?-then-return-it))) > (use a) > (do-something-else)) Is that the same as this? (let ((a (does-an-a-exist?-then-return-it))) (if a (use a) (do-something-else))) > (and-let* ((a (an-a-exists)) > (b (b-depending-on-a-also-exists))) > (test-using a b)) Is that the same as this? (let* ((a (an-a-exists)) (b (b-depending-on-a-also-exists))) (and a b (test-using a b))) or this? (let* ((a (an-a-exists)) (b (and a (b-depending-on-a-also-exists)))) (and b (test-using a b))) or something else?
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |