[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#73853: 31.0.50; Should and-let* become a synonym for when-let*?
From: |
Drew Adams |
Subject: |
bug#73853: 31.0.50; Should and-let* become a synonym for when-let*? |
Date: |
Tue, 29 Oct 2024 16:36:17 +0000 |
FWIW, +1.
___
I don't understand why language-design discussions,
even major ones sometimes, are carried out in
debbugs and not always in emacs-devel@gnu.org.
I can understand that some real BUG discussion can
diverge or expand to a design discussion, but even
then I'd think that that design discussion should
be gently moved to emacs-devel.
Some such discussions could even benefit from a
mention in other places, such as help-gnu-emacs,
so more users could tune in to the discussion in
emacs-devel if they're interested.
- bug#73853: 31.0.50; Should and-let* become a synonym for when-let*?, (continued)
- bug#73853: 31.0.50; Should and-let* become a synonym for when-let*?, Stefan Monnier, 2024/10/27
- bug#73853: 31.0.50; Should and-let* become a synonym for when-let*?, Michael Heerdegen, 2024/10/28
- bug#73853: 31.0.50; Should and-let* become a synonym for when-let*?, Stefan Monnier, 2024/10/28
- bug#73853: 31.0.50; Should and-let* become a synonym for when-let*?, Drew Adams, 2024/10/27
- bug#73853: 31.0.50; Should and-let* become a synonym for when-let*?, Howard Melman, 2024/10/27
- bug#73853: 31.0.50; Should and-let* become a synonym for when-let*?, Sean Whitton, 2024/10/27
bug#73853: 31.0.50; Should and-let* become a synonym for when-let*?, Jonas Bernoulli, 2024/10/29