[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#73853: 31.0.50; Should and-let* become a synonym for when-let*?
From: |
Stefan Kangas |
Subject: |
bug#73853: 31.0.50; Should and-let* become a synonym for when-let*? |
Date: |
Wed, 30 Oct 2024 18:10:44 -0500 |
Jonas Bernoulli <jonas@bernoul.li> writes:
> It is very disappointing that you have chosen to deprecate if-let and
> when-let in such a rushed manner. The same was done and reverted in
> 2018, and many of the same actors are involved this time around.
> I am surprised that you would make the same unforced error again.
>
> Reading through this and past conversations it is clear that there is no
> consensus what the ultimate goal is. But as far as I can tell, few, if
> any, are fully satisfied with the current (30.0.*) situation. There
> also seems to be agreement that unfortunate mistakes were made in the
> past, which limits our options now.
The goal is:
- To not have two macros doing the same thing, i.e. the pairs
`when-let`/`when-let*` and `if-let`/`if-let*`.
- To deprecate the single binding version of `when-let`.
> This could have been prevented if more people (including non-debbugs and
> non-emacs-devel regulars) were given a chance to think about the problem
> and time to articulate their concerns and proposals, before facts were
> created. Or even if the people who did take part in past conversations
> had spend more time actually talking things through.
I can agree that the timeline might have been on the shorter end here.
That said, I wasn't aware of any large controversy surrounding this.
If I was, I might have suggested that we give this more time.
> The same could have been done every time the dissatisfying state of the
> foo-let forms was brought up again, but instead new facts were rushed at
> every turn.
>
> Without stopping this destructive pattern, you won't be able to fix this
> mess.
I don't know what this is in reference to, sorry. I feel like I'm
missing some background. Could you perhaps help fill me in?
I searched the archives, but failed to find anything relevant.
> My short-term proposal is this:
Hmm, the points you raise are interesting but procedural in character.
Besides your concern that people might be unhappy with the decision,
a point that is fully taken, perhaps it would help if we could focus
on technical points instead.
Your proposal seems to be that we should rethink the decision to mark
`when-let`/`if-let` as obsolete. Is that correct?
If yes, perhaps you could explain this in more detail? What problem do
you see with marking them as obsolete?
Do you have a suggestion for what we should do instead?
bug#73853: 31.0.50; Should and-let* become a synonym for when-let*?, Jonas Bernoulli, 2024/10/29