Re: PSPP-BUG: pspp bug

[Ben Pfaff]

That seems bad.  "1.00" and NaN are pretty different.  Do you
think it's worth looking into the calculations, or should we just
ignore this difference as we have others?

John Darrington <address@hidden> writes:

> My system fails the new test:
>
> 395. factor.at:1803: testing FACTOR /ROTATION=NOROTATE ...
> ../../tests/factor.at:1821: pspp -O format=csv factor-norotate.sps
> --- -   2012-04-04 11:18:24.388115600 +0100
> +++ 
> /home/Darringt/.p/P/UTP_00/ClearQuest/tests/testsuite.dir/at-groups/395/stdout
>       2012-04-04 11:18:23.366814100 +0100
> @@ -7,7 +7,7 @@
>  TRAIT5,7.29,2.66,7
>  
>  Table: KMO and Bartlett's Test
> -Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin Measure of Sampling Adequacy,,1.00
> +Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin Measure of Sampling Adequacy,,NaN
>  Bartlett's Test of Sphericity,Approx. Chi-Square,NaN
>  ,df,10
>  ,Sig.,NaN
> 395. factor.at:1803:  FAILED (factor.at:1821)
>
>
> On Tue, Apr 03, 2012 at 10:00:28PM -0700, Ben Pfaff wrote:
>      Thank you very much for the bug report.  I reproduced the bug and
>      fixed this on the PSPP "master" branch.
>      -- 
>      Ben Pfaff 
>      http://benpfaff.org
>      
>      _______________________________________________
>      Bug-gnu-pspp mailing list
>      address@hidden
>      https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-gnu-pspp

-- 
Ben Pfaff 
http://benpfaff.org