[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: gettext and C usage
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: gettext and C usage |
Date: |
Thu, 28 Feb 2002 17:54:20 +0200 (IST) |
On Thu, 28 Feb 2002, Bruno Haible wrote:
> Hans-Bernhard Broeker writes:
> > Since when would 'reasonability' of a choice of target platform have
> > been a valid argument for GNU?
>
> Since ever. See the GNU standards, section "Portability between
> System Types".
With all due respect to principles, I think this is not the right case to
apply them. The price for having an ifdef that evaluates to non-zero on
99.9% of platforms is negligible, and IMHO is certainly not worth the
kind of user aggravation if she happens to need Texinfo (or any other
package) on one of those 0.1%.
FWIW, the same person who maintains the GNU Standards consistently tells
Emacs maintainers to keep compatibility to systems that are even older
than the one cited by Ian. So my reading of the GNU Standards language
is that a maintainer could consider dropping support for ``unreasonable''
platforms if its support costs him/her a considerable effort. But when
there's no effort, dropping support for a platform is not recommended.
- Re: gettext and C usage, (continued)
Re: gettext and C usage, Ian Lance Taylor, 2002/02/25
Message not availableRe: gettext and C usage, Bruno Haible, 2002/02/28
Re: gettext and C usage,
Eli Zaretskii <=