[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: find (and friends) bug?
From: |
Tom Lord |
Subject: |
Re: find (and friends) bug? |
Date: |
Mon, 4 Mar 2002 03:54:44 -0800 (PST) |
Basically, some of the collating-element underbrush got
cleaned out. For example, in the old POSIX, [^[:alpha:]]+ was
required to match "aa" in a Danish locale, since "aa" is a
collating element that is not an alphabetic character. The
new POSIX does not require this: it gives implementations more
freedom to "do the right thing" (and thus it can make life
harder on application writers :-).
Wonderful. That's actually an improvement. I'll have to read the
details, but it sounds like Rx actually becomes more accurate as a
result of this change, not less.
I hope I'm not salting anybody's wounds, but Plaugher's comments on
these matters in "The Standard C Library" are pretty explanatory.
-t
- Re: find (and friends) bug?, (continued)
- Re: find (and friends) bug?, Tom Lord, 2002/03/04
- Re: find (and friends) bug?, Thomas Bushnell, BSG, 2002/03/04
- Re: find (and friends) bug?, Tom Lord, 2002/03/04
- Re: find (and friends) bug?, Thomas Bushnell, BSG, 2002/03/05
- Re: find (and friends) bug?, Paul Eggert, 2002/03/04
- Re: find (and friends) bug?, Miles Bader, 2002/03/04
- Re: find (and friends) bug?, Paul Eggert, 2002/03/04
- Re: find (and friends) bug?, Tom Lord, 2002/03/13
- Re: find (and friends) bug?, Tom Lord, 2002/03/04
- Re: find (and friends) bug?, Paul Eggert, 2002/03/04
- Re: find (and friends) bug?,
Tom Lord <=
- Re: find (and friends) bug?, Tom Lord, 2002/03/04
- Re: find (and friends) bug?, Paul Eggert, 2002/03/04
- Message not available
- Re: find (and friends) bug?, Paul Jarc, 2002/03/03