[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
make check failure
From: |
David Ronis |
Subject: |
make check failure |
Date: |
Wed, 25 Sep 2002 15:41:24 -0400 |
I've just built binutils-2.13 on an i686-linux-gnu box using
gcc-2.95.3. I configured with the default CFLAGS. The build went
fine, but make check failed at:
/home/ronis/binutils-2.13/gas/testsuite/lib/run gasp
-I/home/ronis/binutils-2.13/gas/testsuite/gasp -s
/home/ronis/binutils-2.13/gas/testsuite/gasp/flonums.asm -o gasp.out
7c7
< .float -09.0
---
> .float -9.0
9c9
< .float 0.09
---
> .float 0.9
11c11
< .float +0.09
---
> .float +0.9
13c13
< .float +.09
---
> .float +.9
15c15
< .float -0.09
---
> .float -00.0009
17c17
< .float -2.0900
---
> .float -2.900
19c19
< .float 1.1e+8
---
> .float 1.1e+10
21c21
< .float +1.1e+8
---
> .float +1.1e+10
23c23
< .float +1.1e-8
---
> .float +1.1e-10
25c25
< .float -1.1E+8
---
> .float -1.1E+10
27c27
< .float +1.1E+512
---
> .float +1.1E+1000
29c29
< .float +1.1E+1 8
---
> .float +1.1E+0001 8
31c31
< .float 9.9E-8 8
---
> .float 11.11E-10 8
child process exited abnormally
FAIL: gasp flonums
I also tried a gcc-3.3 20020902 (experimental) as well as more
aggressive CFLAGS (which created additional errors); the gasp flonums
error remained.
Is this known, and is it safe to install?
David
[Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- make check failure,
David Ronis <=