Re: [Mingw-users] Re: More patch 2.5.9 hacking

[Manu]

Earnie Boyd wrote:

[...]
> Well, I've been contemplating modifying MinGW's unistd.h anyway for 
> this.  Seems the right thing to do since unistd.h is a convenience MinGW 
> add on for UNIX programs anyway.  Manu, since you started this, do you 
> want to do the honors of patching the MinGW unistd.h file?

Yes, of course :)

> You should 
> use the _mkdir MS version in the body of the definition.

Ok, I'll commit my changes.

Manu.