[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: diff: suboptimal behaviour with errors
From: |
Thomas Schwinge |
Subject: |
Re: diff: suboptimal behaviour with errors |
Date: |
Sat, 27 Mar 2004 13:00:16 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.4.1i |
On Fri, Mar 26, 2004 at 05:55:17PM -0500, Paul Jarc wrote:
> Thomas Schwinge <address@hidden> wrote:
> > soft errors (i.e. not enough memory, inable to open files etc.): 111
>
> More precisely, 111 is usually only for transient problems that could
> go away on their own, depending on what the rest of the system is
> doing: ENFILE, ENOMEM, etc. Non-transient problems like ENOENT,
> EACCES, etc., are typically reported as hard errors.
That was what I meant.
I agree that my examples were not clear about that.
Regards,
Thomas
- diff: suboptimal behaviour with errors, Thomas Schwinge, 2004/03/18
- Re: diff: suboptimal behaviour with errors, Paul Eggert, 2004/03/18
- Re: diff: suboptimal behaviour with errors, Thomas Schwinge, 2004/03/19
- Re: diff: suboptimal behaviour with errors, Thomas Schwinge, 2004/03/26
- Re: diff: suboptimal behaviour with errors, Paul Eggert, 2004/03/27
- Re: diff: suboptimal behaviour with errors, Thomas Schwinge, 2004/03/27
- Re: diff: suboptimal behaviour with errors, Paul Eggert, 2004/03/27