[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Forma plural
From: |
Bruno Haible |
Subject: |
Re: Forma plural |
Date: |
Thu, 25 Aug 2005 13:31:22 +0200 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.5 |
Hello,
Eddy Petrişor wrote:
> I would like to report that the correct form for the plurals for
> Romanian is the following one:
>
> nplurals=3;plural=(n==1?0:(((n%100>19)||((n%100==0)&&(n!=0)))?2:1))
>
> Please change this in the gettext code base.
Thanks for the report. But how come the literature about Romanian
grammar [1] [2] doesn't mention this? Also, since the formula is a bit
complicated, could you please confirm it by writing the translation of
"<n> errors" (or it can be any other noun):
0 errors = ?
1 error = ?
2 errors = ?
...
19 errors = ?
20 errors = ?
...
99 errors = ?
100 errors = ?
101 errors = ?
102 errors = ?
...
119 errors = ?
120 errors = ?
...
Bruno
[1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Romanian_grammar
[2] http://www.geocities.com/email_theguy/rromanian.htm
- Re: Forma plural, Eddy Petrişor, 2005/08/25
- Re: Forma plural,
Bruno Haible <=
- Re: Forma plural, Eddy Petrişor, 2005/08/25
- Re: Forma plural, Bruno Haible, 2005/08/25
- Re: Forma plural, Bruno Haible, 2005/08/26
- Re: Forma plural, Eddy Petrişor, 2005/08/29
- Re: Forma plural, Bruno Haible, 2005/08/29
- Re: Forma plural, Eddy Petrişor, 2005/08/29