[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [RFC] automatic apostrophes
From: |
Bruce Korb |
Subject: |
Re: [RFC] automatic apostrophes |
Date: |
Tue, 29 Aug 2006 08:57:55 -0700 |
Hi Bruno, et al.,
Why is this important?
I understand that it is smooth and nice to have language flow in a
natural way. But here we are not talking about English or Catalan
composition, but about comprehensibility of messages between a program
and some human reader. The idea is to convey some state information
to a human. To the extent that stiltedness blocks comprehension, it
needs fixing. Formatting text like "a %s went offline" is completely
adequate for conveying information, even if the thing that was going
offline went by a name that began with a vowel. It does not impede
comprehension. However, reworking a sentence so the article would not
be needed might wind up just as stilted and perhaps not as readily
understood. Maybe that isn't a good idea either. So, if apostrophe
misplacement and article mismatching do not impede comprehension, why
is this important?
:) Cheers - Bruce
Re: [RFC] automatic apostrophes, Robert Millan, 2006/08/29