[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Building Diffutils with MinGW
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: Building Diffutils with MinGW |
Date: |
Fri, 04 May 2012 23:52:41 +0300 |
> Date: Fri, 04 May 2012 11:39:51 -0700
> From: Paul Eggert <address@hidden>
> CC: address@hidden
>
> > One possibility is to have a separate header, ms/mingw.h, which
> > src/system.h will include
>
> Sure, something like that would be fine, though I'd rather
> put the relevant changes into the ms/* subdirectory.
> For example, we could create a file ms/system.h that does
> something like this:
>
> #include <mingw.h>
> #include_next <system.h>
>
> and then have the Microsoft build compile with -I../ms before
> -I. Or, if something like that doesn't suffice, we could have the
> Microsoft build patch src/system.h first thing, put the
> patched version into ms/system.h, and then continue building
> with -I../ms.
That's okay, but then the configure script will have to add the
"-I../ms" switch to the GCC command-line arguments.
- Building Diffutils with MinGW, Eli Zaretskii, 2012/05/04
- Re: Building Diffutils with MinGW, Paul Eggert, 2012/05/04
- Re: Building Diffutils with MinGW, Eli Zaretskii, 2012/05/04
- Re: Building Diffutils with MinGW, Paul Eggert, 2012/05/04
- Re: Building Diffutils with MinGW,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: Building Diffutils with MinGW, Paul Eggert, 2012/05/04
- Re: Building Diffutils with MinGW, Eli Zaretskii, 2012/05/05
- Re: Building Diffutils with MinGW, Eli Zaretskii, 2012/05/05
- Re: Building Diffutils with MinGW, Jim Meyering, 2012/05/05
- Re: Building Diffutils with MinGW, Eli Zaretskii, 2012/05/05
- Re: Building Diffutils with MinGW, Paul Eggert, 2012/05/06