[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Bug-gnubg] address@hidden: GNUBG (23062002)]

From: Øystein Johansen
Subject: [Bug-gnubg] address@hidden: GNUBG (23062002)]
Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2002 16:16:56 +0000
User-agent: Mutt/1.2.5i


Anyone care to look at this?


----- Forwarded message from address@hidden -----

From: address@hidden
Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2002 09:31:25 EDT
Subject: GNUBG (23062002)
To: address@hidden
X-Mailer: AOL 6.0 for Windows DE sub 10512

Hi Oeystein,

thanks for alyways replying so fast - and for all your other efforts
concerning GNUBG, of course!

When I analysed a FIBS-match played by me against iceblot I was
astonished that according to GNUBG, version 23.06.2002 I committed
4 wrong passes (iceblot1.txt).
Strange - I only did pass 2 times in the whole match (as you can see
easily: iceblot1.mat).

Apparently, there is something wrong with the import tool,
in Game 1 the game record of GNUBG looks like this:
12 Double to 2      Drop
13                  Drop

The same procedure as well in Game 2:
22 Double to 2      Drop
23                  Drop

Why these double drop lines ?

By the way: I do not agree with the judgement of GNUBG concerning the
second pass (correct response:take):
Take 31,864%
Drop 31,780%
In my opinion this pass was justified. What do the experts say ?

One further question: in the take analysis windows stands "cubeless 2 ply"
although I activated cubeful chequer evaluation !? How about that ?

Just one little point: if I export a position into html-file, the position
is not exactly the same I wanted to export (the colours of the stones
were mixed).
But no more critics, GNUBG is great !!

Thanks to you


----- End forwarded message -----

Attachment: iceblot1.ZIP
Description: Zip compressed data

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]