|
From: | Joseph Heled |
Subject: | Re: [Bug-gnubg] Re: Profiler output |
Date: | Tue, 12 Nov 2002 07:21:39 +1300 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; SunOS sun4u; en-US; rv:1.1) Gecko/20020829 |
I would repeat the EqualKeys inlining under 3.1 or 3.2 It's optimization is so much better. -Joseph Jim Segrave wrote:
On Tue 12 Nov 2002 (06:16 +1300), Joseph Heled wrote:Jim Segrave wrote:Interestingly, both the profiler and running unprofiled code show that inlining EqualKeys() actually is a slight performance loss.(about 2% slower over the same 376 move analysis). I am guessing that it might stop some other optimisations.Interesting. Are you using gcc 3.1 or 3.2?address@hidden:/usr/local/src/gnubg.prof# gcc --version 2.95.4
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |