[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Bug-gnubg] bitfields

From: Jim Segrave
Subject: Re: [Bug-gnubg] bitfields
Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2002 19:16:52 +0100
User-agent: Mutt/1.4i

On Mon 25 Nov 2002 (19:01 +0100), Jim Segrave wrote:
> This will seem dumb, but why do we save evalcontexts with moverecords?
> Assuming (which may not be true) that there are relatively few
> different evalcontexts active during any run of gnubg, then you could
> replace storing the contexts with storing simply an index into a table
> of pointers to copies of the setups, which would make the storage
> requirements even smaller (and makes comparing setups and contexts
> even faster), for what that might be worth.

Umm - I just poked about in eval.c. Nevermind, it's already been well

Jim Segrave           address@hidden

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]