Re: [Bug-gnubg] Re: Cubeless Rollout Bug In New Build (Now fixed! )

[Joseph Heled]

Moore, Dave wrote:
> This is a pretty promising result!  Just to play Devil's advocate, 
> though, isn't it possible that this shows that GnuBG is perhaps worse at 
> defending against a backgame while being equally good at playing a backgame?
>  
Neil choose this position because he thinks it represents a skill test 
for the backgame player only. I think this is mostly true. Some of us 
have looked at games played and I think no one saw big errors on the 
trapped side.

Only a "multi bot" rollout will settle the issue, but it is a long time 
until SN becomes open source :)

-Joseph

> Thanks,
> Dave
>  
>
>     -----Original Message-----
>     *From:* address@hidden [mailto:address@hidden
>     *Sent:* Friday, January 10, 2003 9:23 AM
>     *To:* address@hidden
>     *Subject:* [Bug-gnubg] Re: Cubeless Rollout Bug In New Build (Now
>     fixed!)
>
>     Hi
>     Just downloaded the new build from Nardy's site and checked the
>     backgame position I sent you  (137.sgf) that I was testing all the
>     bots with.
>     Here are the results at 0-ply. (32000 trials) Hey GNU is strongest!!
>
>     JF       0-Ply  -0.672 40.2/0.9/0.0---59.8/35.0/13.6
>     SW3.2 0-Ply       -0.669 40.4/1.0/0.0---59.6/35.7/13.0
>     SW4 0-Ply       -0.636 42.1/1.0/0.0---57.9/35.7/13.1
>     GNU       0-Ply  -0.582 43.5/0.9/0.0---56.4/34.7/11.5
>
>     I'm testing this position at higher plies now.
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> Bug-gnubg mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-gnubg