[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Bug-gnubg] Configure on Windows (was:GTK+ 2.2 Win32 build: display
From: |
Holger |
Subject: |
Re: [Bug-gnubg] Configure on Windows (was:GTK+ 2.2 Win32 build: display much too slow) |
Date: |
Wed, 29 Jan 2003 18:09:55 +0100 |
On Wed, 29 Jan 2003 15:47:57 +0000, Joern Thyssen <address@hidden>
wrote:
>On Wed, Jan 29, 2003 at 02:25:39PM +0100, Holger wrote
>> On Tue, 28 Jan 2003 08:25:01 +0000, Joern Thyssen <address@hidden>
>> wrote:
>> >On Tue, Jan 28, 2003 at 12:36:28AM +0100, Holger wrote
>> >> On Fri, 24 Jan 2003 08:37:24 +0000, Joern Thyssen wrote:
>> >> > What does config.guess report for a windows system?
>> >>
>> >> For MSYS:
>> >>
>> >> $ uname -a
>> >> MINGW32_95-4.0 SOL 1.0.7(0.46/3/2) 2002-05-09 08:36 i686 unknown
>> >> $ ./config.guess
>> >> i686-pc-mingw32
>> >>
>> >> even though it's only a Pentium 1.
>> >
>> >I can add some magic to configure, so systems that end on "mingw32"
>> >triggers "#define WIN32 1"?
>>
>> I don't know whether there are more compile platforms on Windows
>> (Cygwin ?) that GNUbg currently compiles with. For a start this is ok,
>> I guess.
>
>I've commited some configure magic. Can you try if it, please?
I'll try it at home.
>As far as I know the other windows builders maintain their own specially
>designed config.h and do not use configure.
So do I. But Nardy was mentioning that "#define WIN32 1" and -lwinmm
were missing.
I've only run configure so far in order to get an idea what config.h
should look like. For make I still have to install automake, autoconf
and so on.
Btw, could someone on Unix update sgf.c in CVS? As I neither have
bison installed yet, it doesn't autobuild from sgf.y.
Regards,
Holger
- Re: [Bug-gnubg] GTK+ 2.2 Win32 build: display much too slow, (continued)
- Re: [Bug-gnubg] GTK+ 2.2 Win32 build: display much too slow, Nardy Pillards, 2003/01/22
- Re: [Bug-gnubg] GTK+ 2.2 Win32 build: display much too slow, Nardy Pillards, 2003/01/22
- Re: [Bug-gnubg] GTK+ 2.2 Win32 build: display much too slow, Holger, 2003/01/22
- Re: [Bug-gnubg] GTK+ 2.2 Win32 build: display much too slow, Nardy Pillards, 2003/01/22
- Re: [Bug-gnubg] GTK+ 2.2 Win32 build: display much too slow, Holger, 2003/01/23
- Re: [Bug-gnubg] GTK+ 2.2 Win32 build: display much too slow, Joern Thyssen, 2003/01/24
- Re: [Bug-gnubg] GTK+ 2.2 Win32 build: display much too slow, Holger, 2003/01/27
- Re: [Bug-gnubg] GTK+ 2.2 Win32 build: display much too slow, Joern Thyssen, 2003/01/28
- Re: [Bug-gnubg] GTK+ 2.2 Win32 build: display much too slow, Holger, 2003/01/29
- Re: [Bug-gnubg] GTK+ 2.2 Win32 build: display much too slow, Joern Thyssen, 2003/01/29
- Re: [Bug-gnubg] Configure on Windows (was:GTK+ 2.2 Win32 build: display much too slow),
Holger <=
- Re: [Bug-gnubg] Configure on Windows (was:GTK+ 2.2 Win32 build: display much too slow), Holger, 2003/01/29
- Re: [Bug-gnubg] Configure on Windows (was:GTK+ 2.2 Win32 build: display much too slow), Joern Thyssen, 2003/01/29
- Re: [Bug-gnubg] Configure on Windows (was:GTK+ 2.2 Win32 build: display much too slow), Holger, 2003/01/30