[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Bug-gnubg] Re: New Contact Net Error Rates
From: |
Jim Segrave |
Subject: |
Re: [Bug-gnubg] Re: New Contact Net Error Rates |
Date: |
Thu, 20 Feb 2003 17:40:22 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.2.5.1i |
On Thu 20 Feb 2003 (08:51 -0500), address@hidden wrote:
> In a message dated 20/02/2003 12:05:02 GMT Standard Time,
> address@hidden writes:
>
>
> > The numbers for the newest incarnation
> > that Michael Depreli has published recently GOL have been
> > really impressive!
> >
> > David
> >
>
> Not wanting to put any dampeners on anything but as David rightly pointed out
> I
> need to run an analysis with the nuGNU to get a full picture.
> I'm currently doing so and there are a few new positions where previously all
> bots concurred where now nuGNU disagrees and rollouts have shown nuGNU to be
> wrong. I'll update the results and report back.
This leads me to a point I've been wondering about. Everyone discusses
gnubg having errors on odd ply evaluations. Can someone explain why
this would be? I have always taken it on faith that this is true, but
I'd like to understand the mechanism.
--
Jim Segrave address@hidden
- [Bug-gnubg] Re: New Contact Net Error Rates, Michaeldepreli, 2003/02/20
- Re: [Bug-gnubg] Re: New Contact Net Error Rates,
Jim Segrave <=
- RE: [Bug-gnubg] Re: New Contact Net Error Rates, Moore, Dave, 2003/02/20
- Re: [Bug-gnubg] Re: New Contact Net Error Rates, Jim Segrave, 2003/02/20
- Re: [Bug-gnubg] Even, odd and half plies (WAS: New Contact Net Error Rates), Nis, 2003/02/25
- Re: [Bug-gnubg] Even, odd and half plies (WAS: New Contact Net Error Rates), Joseph Heled, 2003/02/25
- Re: [Bug-gnubg] Even, odd and half plies (WAS: New Contact Net Error Rates), Jim Segrave, 2003/02/25
- Re: [Bug-gnubg] Even, odd and half plies (WAS: New Contact Net Error Rates), Nis, 2003/02/26
- Re: [Bug-gnubg] Even, odd and half plies (WAS: New Contact Net Error Rates), Joseph Heled, 2003/02/26
- Re: [Bug-gnubg] Even, odd and half plies (WAS: New Contact Net Error Rates), Joseph Heled, 2003/02/26
- Re: [Bug-gnubg] Even, odd and half plies (WAS: New Contact Net Error Rates), Nis, 2003/02/27
- RE: [Bug-gnubg] Even, odd and half plies (WAS: New Contact Net Error Rates), David Montgomery, 2003/02/27