[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: [Bug-gnubg] 1-chequer hypergammon

From: Ian Shaw
Subject: RE: [Bug-gnubg] 1-chequer hypergammon
Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2003 17:54:57 +0100

> From:  Ned> Cross
> Hmm, I've never played 1-checker hyper, but it seems to me 
> gammons would
> always be equal to wins for both sides by definition.  

D'oh! Of course they are. I'd never played 1-checker hyper, either, but you're 
obviously much quicker on the uptake than me.

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]