[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Bug-gnubg] branding: choosing an exact name

From: Alef Rosenbaum
Subject: Re: [Bug-gnubg] branding: choosing an exact name
Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2003 18:53:16 +0100
User-agent: Microsoft-Entourage/

> [snip]
> But in real life, the guy who does the work gets the most
> votes.  ;-)
> -- Rod

Agree, and the consensus from the hardest working core GNU Backgammon team
seems to be for gnubg.

Although I do think GnuBg looks better, perhaps I'm overly affected by
ephemeral fashion. Who's to say that in a few years time all these
mixed-case names might appear dated and the modest "gnubg" might look
cutting edge?

But my main thought is that if it's anything other than gnubg then every
time someone types it there's the potential for that moment of hesitation
and doubt about the effort of using the shift key. A good acronym is KISS --
keep it simple, stupid!

I'm changing my vote to gnubg.


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]