[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Bug-gnubg] branding: choosing an exact name

From: Nardy Pillards
Subject: Re: [Bug-gnubg] branding: choosing an exact name
Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2003 20:15:08 +0200

From: "Alef Rosenbaum" <address@hidden>
Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 7:53 PM

> > [snip]
> > But in real life, the guy who does the work gets the most
> > votes.  ;-)
> >
> > -- Rod
> Agree, and the consensus from the hardest working core GNU Backgammon team
> seems to be for gnubg.
> Although I do think GnuBg looks better, perhaps I'm overly affected by
> ephemeral fashion. Who's to say that in a few years time all these
> mixed-case names might appear dated and the modest "gnubg" might look
> cutting edge?
> But my main thought is that if it's anything other than gnubg then every
> time someone types it there's the potential for that moment of hesitation
> and doubt about the effort of using the shift key. A good acronym is
> keep it simple, stupid!
> I'm changing my vote to gnubg.
> -Alef

Although I like GNUBg (referring to GNU), I changed all appearances of GNUBg
to gnubg on my pages.
Exception: the URL
(pointing to Most Recent Build)


Alef, if their are _any_ grammatical and/or orthographic errors on those
pages, you are most welcome to send me the list (in zipped form it there are
too many? ;-))

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]