[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Bug-gnubg] documentation: checker vs. chequer
From: |
Joern Thyssen |
Subject: |
Re: [Bug-gnubg] documentation: checker vs. chequer |
Date: |
Mon, 16 Jun 2003 09:07:46 +0000 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.4.1i |
On Mon, Jun 16, 2003 at 09:08:21AM +0100, Ian Shaw wrote
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Alef Rosenbaum
> > Sent: 14 June 2003 17:45
> >
> > In the FAQ I've changed it all to "checker", but the menus and options
> > within gnubg itself will need changing.
>
> Awk! Cough! Splutter!
he he, I prefer chequer as well.
> Is it only me trying to maintain my own rich cultural heritage and
> resist the creeping Americanisation of all life? One of the things I
> love about gnubg is the spelling of chequer. Mind you, since many of you
> aren't native English speakers, perhaps you don't care whether you are
> Americanised or Anglicized ;)
In fact, the program has been internationalised to US English. I'm not
sure this works on windows (yet), but under unix you can set LANG=en_GB
or LANG=en_US to get either language. I haven't checked recently that it
works, but the code for it is there.
Jørn