[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Bug-gnubg] New fuctionallity for batch operations, opinions wanted

From: Joern Thyssen
Subject: Re: [Bug-gnubg] New fuctionallity for batch operations, opinions wanted!
Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2003 22:28:28 +0000
User-agent: Mutt/1.4.1i

On Sat, Jul 12, 2003 at 08:11:27AM +1200, Joseph Heled wrote
> Joern Thyssen wrote:
> >On Sat, Jul 12, 2003 at 07:22:28AM +1200, Joseph Heled wrote
> >
> >
> >So which of gnubg's function would you be most interested in?
> >
> I don't think it matters. If you start by providing the basic stuff to 
> get Øystein batch stuff going, it will be great.
> Say,
> gnubg.import(name)
> gnubg.match.analyze()
> gnubg.match.save(name)
> (names are only a suggestion)

These are already high-level commands in gnubg, and can be reached

gnubg.command("import mat blah.mat")
gnubg.command("analyse match")
gnubg.command("save match blah.sgf")

Do we want "native" python equivalents as well?


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]