[Bug-gnubg] Understanding evaluation

[Albert Silver]

GNU Backgammon  Position ID: cLfBATA2NycGAA
                 Match ID   : MAEgA0AACAAA
 +12-11-10--9--8--7-------6--5--4--3--2--1-+     O: Moshe Tissona
 | X     O     O    |   | O  O     O  O  X |     4 points
 | X           O    |   | O  O     O  O  X |     On roll
 | X           O    |   |    O             |     
 |                  |   |                  |     
 |                  |   |                  |    
^|                  |BAR|                  |     25 point match (Cube:
1)
 |                  |   |                  |    
 |                  |   |                  |     
 |                  |   | X  X             |     
 | O           X  X |   | X  X             |     
 | O           X  X |   | X  X             |     1 point
 +13-14-15-16-17-18------19-20-21-22-23-24-+     X: Jon Royset

Annotation

Casper van der Tak: The pass is correct, but surprisingly close,
indicating the importance of filling in holes when coming home against
deep anchor games.

Kit Woolsey: I don't understand the bot evaluation. With a cubeless
equity of .657 and only a moderate gammon threat, I don't see how the
pass can be close? There has to be something wrong here. Personally I
would make Tissona's chances even better, and I believe this is a
monster pass.