[Bug-gnubg] Re: Monte Carlo

[Joseph Heled]

Still, there is a problem.
Can someone else tell me if he gets the same results as me or not?


(cLfBATA2NycGAA / MAEgA0AACAAA)

(in the sgf file)

Cube analysis
2-ply cubeless equity  +0.657 (Money:  +0.653)
   74.0%  18.9%   1.0% -  26.0%   2.6%   0.0%
Cubeful equities:
1. No double            +1.040
2. Double, take         +1.234  ( +0.194)
3. Double, pass         +1.000  ( -0.040)
Proper cube action: Too good to double, pass (17.0%)

With
 set matchequitytable "met/zadeh.xml"

Cube analysis
2-ply cubeless equity  +0.658 (Money:  +0.653)
   74.0%  18.9%   1.1% -  26.0%   2.6%   0.0%
Cubeful equities:
1. Double, pass         +1.000
2. Double, take         +1.112  ( +0.112)
3. No double            +0.919  ( -0.081)
Proper cube action: Double, pass

set matchequitytable "met/snowie.xml"

Cube analysis
2-ply cubeless equity  +0.617 (Money:  +0.615)
   72.5%  18.7%   1.0% -  27.5%   3.1%   0.1%
Cubeful equities:
1. Double, take         +0.932
2. Double, pass         +1.000  ( +0.068)
3. No double            +0.805  ( -0.127)
Proper cube action: Double, take

set matchequitytable "met/jacobs.xml"


Cube analysis
2-ply cubeless equity  +0.616 (Money:  +0.613)
   72.3%  18.8%   1.1% -  27.7%   3.2%   0.1%
Cubeful equities:
1. Double, take         +0.980
2. Double, pass         +1.000  ( +0.020)
3. No double            +0.849  ( -0.132)
Proper cube action: Double, take


Albert Silver wrote:
> Snowie or Jacobs, I'm not 100% sure anymore.
>
>                                 Albert
>
> On Tue, 2003-08-12 at 00:32, Joseph Heled wrote:
>
> > Joern thought maybe we are using different equity tables. I am using 
> > zadeh. What did you use for the WC?
> >
> > -Joseph