[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Réf.. . . : Re: [Bug-gnubg] Missed doubles problem ?
From: |
Joern Thyssen |
Subject: |
Re: Réf.. . . : Re: [Bug-gnubg] Missed doubles problem ? |
Date: |
Fri, 29 Aug 2003 19:32:35 +0000 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.4.1i |
On Fri, Aug 29, 2003 at 08:19:43PM +0200, Holger wrote
>
> >It has previously been suggested to improve the logic by calculating the
> >double point (DP) and the too good point (TG), and call it "around TG
> >point" if the gwc is larger than DP + (TG - DP)/2 (assuming TG>DP).
>
> Yes, that's what I'd thought gnubg is doing right now. (Can there be a case
> with TG<DP? Equal yes.)
Yes, take a gammonish position at the score -2,-4. You can easily find
positions that are "too good to double, take" and where TG < DP.
Jørn
pgpqeLqzYaKFH.pgp
Description: PGP signature
- Re: Réf. : Re: [Bug-gnubg] Missed doubles problem ?, Holger, 2003/08/29
- Re: Réf . : Re: [Bug-gnubg] Missed doubles problem ?, Joern Thyssen, 2003/08/29
- Re: Réf... . : Re: [Bug-gnubg] Missed doubles problem ?, Holger, 2003/08/29
- Re: Réf.. . . : Re: [Bug-gnubg] Missed doubles problem ?, Joern Thyssen, 2003/08/29
- Re: Réf.. . . : Re: [Bug-gnubg] Missed doubles problem ?, Holger, 2003/08/29
- Re: Réf. . . . : Re: [Bug-gnubg] Missed doubles problem ?, Joern Thyssen, 2003/08/29
- Re: Réf. . . . : Re: [Bug-gnubg] Missed doubles problem ?, Holger, 2003/08/29
- Re: Réf . . . . : Re: [Bug-gnubg] Missed doubles problem ?, Joern Thyssen, 2003/08/29
- Re: R?f.. . . : Re: [Bug-gnubg] Missed doubles problem ?, Jim Segrave, 2003/08/29
- Re: Réf.. . . : Re: [Bug-gnubg] Missed doubles problem ?,
Joern Thyssen <=