[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [Bug-gnubg] Re: The importance of METs
From: |
kvandoel |
Subject: |
RE: [Bug-gnubg] Re: The importance of METs |
Date: |
Fri, 12 Sep 2003 09:59:17 +0200 (CEST) |
> > It might be useful to do a test of 5-point matches of Woolsey vs.
> > Snowie, which are probably the most commonly used METs. Or find the two
> > which diverge the most and compare those, just to see if there is any
> > noticeable difference.
I tried 100 5pt 0ply matches woolsey.xml agains snowie.xml. Analysing
with woolsey at 0ply a rating discrepancy of 2193 +-8 resulted (as
estimated by the "error rate"). Again totally negligible.
Kees
- Re: [Bug-gnubg] Re: The importance of METs, (continued)
- Re: [Bug-gnubg] Re: The importance of METs, Nis Jorgensen, 2003/09/04
- Re: [Bug-gnubg] Re: The importance of METs, Jim Segrave, 2003/09/04
- Re: [Bug-gnubg] Re: The importance of METs, Douglas Zare, 2003/09/04
- Re: [Bug-gnubg] Re: The importance of METs, Joseph Heled, 2003/09/05
- Re: [Bug-gnubg] Re: The importance of METs, Douglas Zare, 2003/09/09
- RE: [Bug-gnubg] Re: The importance of METs, Albert Silver, 2003/09/09
- RE: [Bug-gnubg] Re: The importance of METs, Albert Silver, 2003/09/04
- Re: [Bug-gnubg] Re: The importance of METs, Joseph Heled, 2003/09/04
RE: [Bug-gnubg] Re: The importance of METs, Ian Shaw, 2003/09/09
RE: [Bug-gnubg] Re: The importance of METs, kvandoel, 2003/09/12
RE: [Bug-gnubg] Re: The importance of METs, kvandoel, 2003/09/13
RE: [Bug-gnubg] Re: The importance of METs, kvandoel, 2003/09/13
RE: [Bug-gnubg] Re: The importance of METs, Ian Shaw, 2003/09/12
Re: [Bug-gnubg] Re: The importance of METs, Robert-Jan Veldhuizen, 2003/09/12