Re: [Bug-gnubg] Fuel for the fire

[Holger]

At 10:22 17.09.2003 +0000, Joern Thyssen wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 17, 2003 at 09:41:21AM +1200, Joseph Heled wrote
>
> > but perhaps what we need is an equivalent to
> > "confidence interval". I
>
> The conf. interval is -0.009 to -0.015, so the player will be rated
> Intermediate to Advanced. Will this confuse users?

Not sure, if it's only two adjacent ratings hopefully not.

> In Albert's example with just one cube decision the 95% CI is infinite,
> thus we cannot assign a textual rating. With just two cube decisions the
> interval will be large, so you may get textual ratings like "Awful to
> World class".

I think above a certain interval we should either leave out the rating 
display or put in parentheses that it's  far from accurate.

Regards,

        Holger