[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [Bug-gnubg] Suggestion: equivalent # of games played in roll outsthx
RE: [Bug-gnubg] Suggestion: equivalent # of games played in roll outsthx to var. reduction
Tue, 14 Oct 2003 14:39:50 +0100
Joern Thyssen wrote:
> Personally I don't find the #equiv games that interesting. The SEs and
> JSDs are much more interesting -- it doesn't help you much
> to know that
> your rollouts is equivalent to 10,000 games if the two moves you're
> rolling out are only separated by one tenth of a SE.
> All rollouts are normally performed with VR, so what's the point of
> knowing that the #equiv games for a non-VR rollout, since nobody would
> do such a rollout (unless they only have S3.2 and enable chequer play
> according to score).
> Other opinions on this subject?
I never look at the equivalent number of games when I see a Snowie rollout. It
may have been interesting in the past, when hand rollouts were performed, or
before VR was introduced. Over the last couple of years I think VR has gained
understanding and acceptance; it's a long time since I've heard anyone question
it's effectiveness. If it's a lot of work to add, I wouldn't bother.
As you say, it's the SE & JSD that interest me.
Just my 2¢
|[Prev in Thread]
||[Next in Thread]|
- RE: [Bug-gnubg] Suggestion: equivalent # of games played in roll outsthx to var. reduction,
Ian Shaw <=