[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Bug-gnubg] long simulation on matches

From: Achim Mueller
Subject: Re: [Bug-gnubg] long simulation on matches
Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2003 15:11:07 +0100
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.4i

* Martin Janke wrote on 28 Nov 2003:

> On Thu, 2003-11-27 at 16:23, Achim Mueller wrote:
> > Hi folks,
> [..]
> >  Is anybody able to write a small python script that starts a
> > new match, stores the result of each game (including
> > gammons/backgammons) and the result of the
> > match into a file, and finally starts a new match? 
> Hi,
> I could do that. I've already got a script which does something similar.
> Exactly what pieces of information do you need in the log file and which
> format do you prefer for it?

Hi again,

I just checked the script here in the office, worked like a charme.
I will do some minor tests and then start a big session of 5 pointers
woolsey.xml vs. snowie.xml

What do you estimate, how many matches have to be played to get
a significant conclusion on

1. which met is better
2. building a new met bases on the results?

Actually I thought about 2ply (checkerplay/cubedecision). What about
0ply checkerplay and 2ply cube decisions to speed up things and get
more material?



achim mueller, anne-frank-str. 25, D-48431 rheine
+49 (0)5971 83767, +49 (0)163 8458340
pgp/gnupg key: 1024D/5DF3A722 (wwwkeys.de.pgp.net)

Attachment: pgpVd2wbl8IjN.pgp
Description: PGP signature

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]