[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Bug-gnubg] GnuBG faring poorly in back games
From: |
Joseph Heled |
Subject: |
Re: [Bug-gnubg] GnuBG faring poorly in back games |
Date: |
Sat, 11 Jun 2005 12:21:38 +1200 |
On 6/11/05, Rod Roark <address@hidden> wrote:
> On Friday 10 June 2005 04:44 pm, Joseph Heled wrote:
> > On 6/11/05, Rod Roark <address@hidden> wrote:
> ...
> > > XB = (B > 3) ? B - 3 : 0;
> > > MWC2 = MWC * (1 - 0.6 * XB / 12);
> > >
> > > This is probably too simple because we'd also want to
> > > consider how the back men are spread among their points.
> > > But does this make sense as a general concept?
> > >
> >
> > I can give a definite "I don't know the answer" here. One have to try
> > it out and see. My bitter experience says it is fiendishly difficult,
> > and would require lots of energy and ingenuity. I don't have the time
> > or inclination at this stage to tackle this, unless I can get money
> > for trying this );
>
> I hear you. I barely have time to worry about it myself,
> but it's just irritating to see ParlorBot and the other bots
> being so taken advantage of.
>
> Why don't you tell me where I might plug in such a formula,
> and I'll try it out with ParlorBot and perhaps tweak it over
> time, hopefully getting some better play from it. We can
> worry about rollouts later.
Well you can't just "plug it in" to a running bot. Like I said this
needs to be tested and twiked to see if it helps at all - because most
likely it will not - certainly not the first tries ...
-Joseph
>
> BTW remember I use "hint 1" to get plays, in case this
> matters.
>
> Cheers,
>
> -- Rod
>
- Re: [Bug-gnubg] GnuBG faring poorly in back games, (continued)
Re: [Bug-gnubg] GnuBG faring poorly in back games, Øystein O Johansen, 2005/06/10