Re: Re: [Bug-gnubg] New win install archive/exes (20061110)

[Massimiliano . Maini]

>Great work as always Max, this should ideally be built as a
>0.16-unstable build.  And the 2-ply fix put into the 0.15 branch (and
>this rebuilt).

Totally right. But I cannot access the CVS repository (hopefully I'll be
able to do it as soon as I move, no early than Feb/Mar 2007).

I know Christian Anthon is working on creating the 0.15 branch, putting
bug-fixes in etc.
I've asked Achim Muller to put cvs snapshot of the stable branch on his web
page, so that I can download them and build distribs from both 0.15 branch
and main trunk (0.16).

Is everybody OK if we go with names 0.15-stable and 0.16-devel ?
The file configure.in in the cvs repository shold be modified accordingly
(in rel_0_15 and MAIN branches respectively).

>I've just looked on gnubg.org and the windows download page no longer
>seems available...  Is someone working on this?
>
>It would be good if we had a download area that looked something like:
>
>gnubg-0.15-stable <link to release notes/changelog>
>            src code <link to tarbull>
>            windows install <link to exe>
>            mac install <link to somewhere - this is down currently>
>            rpm? <does this make sense?>
>
>gnubg-0.16-unstable <link to release notes/changelog>
>            src code <link to tarbull>
>            windows install <link to exe>

I'll see if I can do something about that.

MaX.