[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Re: [Bug-gnubg] gnubg.org windows downloads

From: Massimiliano . Maini
Subject: Re: Re: [Bug-gnubg] gnubg.org windows downloads
Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2006 13:36:16 +0100

>I guess it also makes sence to put "my" stuff on the gnubg page
>itself. On my webpage I slowly run out of space, so I have to delete
>more and more older snapshots.
>I'll work on it at the next weekend, putting the rpms and snapshots
>(stable and main) on gnubng.org.

I've created a WinDistrib directory under /media/, you could create
two others for the code snapshots and the rmps.

Do you plan to have your automatic process creating cvs snapshots
directly on gnubg.org ? That would be great !
If possible, create the snapshots from the two branches (MAIN and
rel_0_15),something like :

      gnubg-sources-0.15-stable-20061114.tar.gz  (stable branch)

      gnubg-sources-0.16-devel-20061114.tar.gz   (main branch)

I know that Christian creates his source archives doing a "source
distrib" ... don't know exactly what that is, but it a bit different
from a pure snapshot of the cvs sources. Maybe you can get in touch
with him for details ...

>I a former thread you also discussed the versioning of gnubg. I
>suggest to take at least 0.16 for the stable branch. All rpms I
>built (for suse and redhat) had either 0.15 or 0.15-1 as
>version-release, and it would be difficult for linux users to
>upgrade a "new" 0.15 from the "old" 0.15-1.
>0.16 also somehow indicates that we reorganised the stuff a little
>bit ;-).

I agree. Only problem is that the repository has a branch tag named
rel_0_15, hence it should be renamed to rel_0_16 to avoid (additional)
confusion. Is this possible Christian ? Playing with branch tag is
somehow tricky ...


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]