[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Bug-gnubg] It is my turn.

From: Joseph Heled
Subject: Re: [Bug-gnubg] It is my turn.
Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2008 12:26:27 +1300

On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 11:27 AM, Christian Anthon
<address@hidden> wrote:
> Hi Joseph,
> I'll gladly take a look at your dobling code, can you point me to the
> location in the code?
> What I meant was that it was partly a fault in the neural net, I
> didn't assume you had written the resign code in gnubg.

OK. I would not have been surprised at the rejection if I was playing
at ply 0. I was surprised only because I set play evaluation at 2 ply.

 You can work your way up from gnubg/gnubg-nn/analyze/danalyze.cc

Personally, I would start with  http://fibs2html.sourceforge.net/ code.


> Christian.
> On Tue, Nov 11, 2008 at 9:59 PM, Joseph Heled <address@hidden> wrote:
>> On Tue, Nov 11, 2008 at 10:14 PM, Christian Anthon
>> <address@hidden> wrote:
>>> Well Joseph you are partly to blame :).
>> Well, that shows you had not been around as long as I am :) I did not
>> write this code. My code always used a different (and I think
>> superior) cube handling method, and always worked at any ply. it is in
>> the gnubg-nn branch if you are interested. it is C++.
>> -Joseph
>>>  Accept/Reject decision were
>>> investigated at 0ply regardless of the player settings, and 0ply
>>> believes that you loose 1% gammon here. I'm going to up the test to
>>> 2ply, it won't be perfect, but certainly better. Alternatively we
>>> could run a one-sided rollout, if somebody thinks it is necessary?
>>> Christian.
>>> On Sun, Nov 9, 2008 at 3:49 AM, Joseph Heled <address@hidden> wrote:
>>>> I offer to resign normal. gnubg declines. why?
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Bug-gnubg mailing list
>>>> address@hidden
>>>> http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-gnubg

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]