[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Bug-gnubg] version 1.0

From: Massimiliano Maini
Subject: Re: [Bug-gnubg] version 1.0
Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 12:11:32 +0200

Christian Anthon <address@hidden> wrote on 30/03/2009 11:19:09:

> On Fri, Mar 27, 2009 at 11:43 AM, Massimiliano Maini
> <address@hidden> wrote:
> >
> > I do agree we should have a stable branch for version 1.0beta.
> > I still hear many players using old gnubg version arguing that the new ones
> > are not stable enough. It's hard to make them understand that the old ones,
> > despite being stable, are also buggy.
> This is not going to be a branch, but the main line. I'm going to tag
> the code to make it easier to identify.

Up to you to decide if 1.0 will be a branch or the main trunk, what matters is
that 1.0 and 2.0 are on separate branches (i.e. one on main, other on a branch).

> Furthermore, the daily
> snapshots shouldn't be used for our "official" released versions.

Right. We will have a 1.0 stable (or alpha or whatever) download  and a "latest"
download (well flagged as work in progress,possibly buggy).

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]