Re: [Bug-gnubg] How strong is the lookahead?

[Christian Anthon]

And if it is money game a significant part of 1.5 is caused by 0ply
doubling a bit early compared to 2ply.

Christian.

2009/3/30 Stick <address@hidden>:
>
> I have played versus 0 ply a lot and I always analyze afterwards using 2
> ply.  I'd say on average 0 ply plays with an error rate of approximately 1.5
> according to 2 ply analysis.  The highest I remember it playing in a semi
> lengthy session is 2.2 and it has been known to play .08 etc...  I think 1.5
> is a fair middle ground.  Not sure if that helps any or not but there you
> have it.
>
> Stick
>
> _______________________________________________
> Bug-gnubg mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-gnubg
>
>