Hmm ... I may agree for take/drops: if you're playing
gnubg and he has doubled, he knows the equities for no double and double/take, hence
the analysis is already done (this under the assumption that gnubg playing level is the
same as the analysis level, e.g. both at World Class, otherwise this won't be correct).
But I'm not sure about luck: luck would require analysis
(at the specified level). Is this really done on the fly ? I thought it was
done only during analysis ...
MaX.
address@hidden
wrote on 04/05/2009 23:31:10:
> I guess I didn't read your message too carefully the first time.
> Take/drops (and Luck I believe) are analysed as you go along when
> playing a computer opponent. Probably wasn't marked in previous
> versions. It doesn't take much if any time. Confusing, possibly.
> Desired, unknown.
>
> Christian.
> On Mon, May 4, 2009 at 11:18 PM, Zulli, Louis
P <address@hidden> wrote: > Hi, >
> I moved away my gnubgautorc. It still happened when I accepted a
> double in this position: u90GAALzPQ8AAA:AgEAAIABAAAA >
> Louis >
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Christian Anthon" <address@hidden>
> To: "Louis P Zulli" <address@hidden>
> Cc: "bug-gnubg" <address@hidden>
> Sent: Monday, May 4, 2009 4:58:30 PM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern
> Subject: Re: New gnubg oddity?
>
> I'm not really sure why or when this would happen. Can you tell me
> if this happens with a clean gnubgautorc file, when the problem appeared,
etc.
>
> Christian.
> On Mon, May 4, 2009 at 9:54 PM, Zulli, Louis
P <address@hidden> wrote: > Hi, >
> I built from the 20090502 snapshot. I'm seeing a behavior that I
> don't recall seeing before. gnubg is putting analysis highlighting
> and ?? on certain plays in the game record as they occur. For
> example, if I take a double and gnubg deems my decision "very
bad,"
> the move appears with ?? and highlighted in yellow. This happens
> during the game, before I request any analysis. "Very lucky"
rolls
> also appear in bold face as they occur. >
> Is this new? Is anyone else seeing this? >
> Louis >
> _______________________________________________
> Bug-gnubg mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-gnubg