[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Bug-gnubg] cvs restored
From: |
Michael Petch |
Subject: |
Re: [Bug-gnubg] cvs restored |
Date: |
Fri, 05 Jun 2009 18:44:33 -0600 |
User-agent: |
Microsoft-Entourage/12.17.0.090302 |
My hand goes up - if you upgrade away from CVS go to Subversion. I
personally see no added value for this particular project (And how we use
revision control) to switch to git.
On 05/06/09 6:33 PM, "保坂範行" <address@hidden> wrote:
> Hi.
>
> I'm not forcing you to use git.
> I'm asking not to use CVS/SVN.
> I'm asking to use distributed one.
> There are choices, hg, bzr, etc. besides git.
>
- [Bug-gnubg] cvs restored, Christian Anthon, 2009/06/04
- Re: [Bug-gnubg] cvs restored, Russ Allbery, 2009/06/05
- Re: [Bug-gnubg] cvs restored, Christian Anthon, 2009/06/05
- Re: [Bug-gnubg] cvs restored, 保坂範行, 2009/06/05
- Re: [Bug-gnubg] cvs restored,
Michael Petch <=
- Re: [Bug-gnubg] cvs restored, Michael Petch, 2009/06/05
- Re: [Bug-gnubg] cvs restored, Joseph Heled, 2009/06/05
- Re: [Bug-gnubg] cvs restored, Michael Petch, 2009/06/05