[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Bug-gnubg] Positions on which 0-ply and 2-ply would disagree
From: |
Christian Anthon |
Subject: |
Re: [Bug-gnubg] Positions on which 0-ply and 2-ply would disagree |
Date: |
Mon, 29 Jun 2009 13:58:15 +0200 |
2ply should excel over 0ply in very dynamic situations. For example
when 1/3 rolls hit and 2/3 don't. In very static situations there is
no reason for 2ply to be better and one would expect it to be down to
the quality of the net.
Christian.
On Sun, Jun 28, 2009 at 1:49 AM, boomslang<address@hidden> wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
>
> What are typical positions that would give a different 'best move' when
> analyzed on 2-ply compared to 0-ply? Is there an ultimate example?
>
>
> thx,
>
>
> boomslang
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Bug-gnubg mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-gnubg
>