Re: [Bug-gnubg] Analyse / Rollout - do we need it?

[Michael Petch]

On 14/10/2011 10:31 AM, address@hidden,net wrote:
>
> The existing .sgf file  writing code knows how to write an .sgf file
> from a game/match kept as a linked list of structs in gnubg. When you
> set up a position like this, the structures aren't set up and the .sgf
> code won't work. It would not be that hard to create functions to
> write an .sgf file from a single position, but it's not been done.
>

This was my feeling as well. It appeared as if we were lacking the code
to currently dump this scenario to an SGF format as it presently exists.
Thanks for the heads up on why this is the case.

> I think the original gnubg code before I did any work, had analyze. I
> may well have been the one who started putting in analyse, but never
> made any effort to update exisiting ones. In theory, it should be in
> the .po files to distinguish UK and US English (US would use analyze,
> UK analyse)
>

Yes, this is strictly a translation file issue, with the exception of
the documentation that seems to be inconsistent at times.

-- 
Michael Petch 
CApp::Sysware Consulting Ltd. 
OpenPGP FingerPrint=D81C 6A0D 987E 7DA5 3219 6715 466A 2ACE 5CAE 3304