Re: [Bug-gnubg] Alternative weights files

[Philippe Michel]

On Tue, 18 Sep 2012, Joseph Heled wrote:

> Just in case you are unaware of it, my code does not reflect gnubg
> playing ability per-se, since it uses its own cube decision code.
> Move selection is similar, but not identical either. Nobody ever
> really compared the two approaches.

Regarding cube decisions, you have reminded it repeatedly, but I wasn't 
aware for the checker play.

> Also, just out of curiosity, why do you think 1M is statistically significant?

1M is nothing special besides a round number, but 50.19% is about 4 
standard deviations above 50%, isn't it ?