[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Bug-gnubg] GNUBG Website online again - Update: Wiki now needs acco
|
From: |
Philippe Michel |
|
Subject: |
Re: [Bug-gnubg] GNUBG Website online again - Update: Wiki now needs account for edits |
|
Date: |
Fri, 8 Feb 2013 23:21:02 +0100 (CET) |
|
User-agent: |
Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) |
On Fri, 8 Feb 2013, Michael Petch wrote:
I'm thinking we should upgrade our Wiki (if we intend to keep it)
Is the wiki really useful ? There weren't many updates there, were they ?
Moreover, the documentation is in a sorry state. There is :
- something in CVS, incomplete and not up to date
- something at http://www.gnu.org/software/gnubg/manual/ (gnu.org,
hence managed by the FSF folks, I suppose), apparently an older version of
the above
- something in the wiki, similar to parts of the CVS document (maybe
Christian Anthon pulled what was in the wiki when he rewrote the manual).
Shouldn't we do something like :
- import recent changes from the wiki into the CVS document and probably
close the wiki, at least as far as documentation is concerned
- have the pages at gnubg.org updated from CVS, say weekly or monthly
- overhaul the manual