[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Bug-gnubg] Evaluation question
|
From: |
Michael Petch |
|
Subject: |
Re: [Bug-gnubg] Evaluation question |
|
Date: |
Wed, 19 Jun 2013 22:34:39 -0600 |
|
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130509 Thunderbird/17.0.6 |
On 19/06/2013 10:29 PM, Michael Petch wrote:
> The reason I ask these questions is that my copy of GNUBG (0.90-mingw
> 20121023) has an analysis shows that the only one GNUBG disagreed a bit
> with was the 63 and it didn't even rate as doubtful. It had about a
> 0.030 error. The rest of the moves the bot agreed with your plays.
I happened to do an analysis after I sent this where it was set to
"expert" which uses no look ahead and it shows the errors you suggest
for the three moves. Expert is a very low analysis level. I recommend
using at a minimum World Class analysis (Settings Menu/Analysis/Analysis
Level set to World Class. I would also set eval/tutor mode to "same as
analysis" if you use the tutor mode.
--
Michael Petch
GNU Backgammon Maintainer / Developer
OpenPGP FingerPrint=D81C 6A0D 987E 7DA5 3219 6715 466A 2ACE 5CAE 3304