|Subject:||Re: [Bug-gnubg] Zadeh and mec mets|
|Date:||Sat, 22 Jun 2013 17:19:09 +1200|
I wanted to ask how the match equities for Zadeh and mec METs (mec not mec26) are handled in gnu – the met files have no array of probabilities so it looks like the computer calculates from first principles. If so something has gone badly wrong with the parameters because the Zadeh equities are often more than 3or 4% different than the values tabulated in his paper of 75. Checking those values in his paper I found that incredibly there was quite negligible error with the rolled out mets produced by Rockwell and Kazaross – less than 1% at all pre crawford scores in a 15 point match and when crawford and post crawford are also considered no error greater than 1.2%. Unfortunately the values you see in Gnu make it look like the worst MET of all.
Bug-gnubg mailing list
|[Prev in Thread]||Current Thread||[Next in Thread]|