[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: The status of gnubg?
From: |
Philippe Michel |
Subject: |
Re: The status of gnubg? |
Date: |
Sun, 18 Oct 2020 23:06:32 +0200 |
On Fri, Oct 16, 2020 at 04:19:32PM +0000, Aaron Tikuisis wrote:
> How often/recently is the gnubg NN retrained? Do we think it can be
> improved much?
The current nets date back from 2012.
They certainly can be improved, but to make a difference one would need
some useful change in either the inputs, the nets structure, the
training database (in case of supervised training) or the training method.
- The status of gnubg?, Aaron Tikuisis, 2020/10/14
- Re: The status of gnubg?, Øystein Schønning-Johansen, 2020/10/14
- Re: The status of gnubg?, Aaron Tikuisis, 2020/10/14
- Re: The status of gnubg?, Joseph Heled, 2020/10/14
- RE: The status of gnubg?, Ian Shaw, 2020/10/16
- Re: The status of gnubg?, Joaquín Koifman, 2020/10/16
- Re: The status of gnubg?, Aaron Tikuisis, 2020/10/16
- Re: The status of gnubg?,
Philippe Michel <=
- Re: The status of gnubg?, Joseph Heled, 2020/10/18
- Re: The status of gnubg?, Øystein Schønning-Johansen, 2020/10/19
- Re: The status of gnubg?, Aaron Tikuisis, 2020/10/19
- Re: The status of gnubg?, Øystein Schønning-Johansen, 2020/10/19
- Re: The status of gnubg?, Aaron Tikuisis, 2020/10/19
- Re: The status of gnubg?, Øystein Schønning-Johansen, 2020/10/19
- Re: The status of gnubg?, Joseph Heled, 2020/10/19
- Re: The status of gnubg?, Aaron Tikuisis, 2020/10/19
- Re: The status of gnubg?, Øystein Schønning-Johansen, 2020/10/19
- Re: The status of gnubg?, Turker Eflanli, 2020/10/19